OLAC Record: Worlds of knowledge in Central Bhutan: Documentation of ’Olekha

OLAC Record
oai:scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu:10125/26102

Metadata

Title: Worlds of knowledge in Central Bhutan: Documentation of ’Olekha

Bibliographic Citation: Hyslop, Gwendolyn, Hyslop, Gwendolyn; 2013-03-02; ’Olekha, a dialect of ‘Black Mountain Mönpa’ (van Driem 1995), is a highly endangered Tibeto- Burman isolate of Central Bhutan with only a handful of fluent speakers remaining. With so few speakers, full documentation and description of many grammatical aspects of the language has been difficult. However, speakers are readily able to discuss various lexical domains, providing a fascinating window into traditional Black Mountain culture. In this paper I illustrate three semantic domains in ’Olekha: agriculture, kinship, and ethnobotany, and discuss how these domains illustrate social history of the ’Olekha speakers apart from and related to other groups in Bhutan. Bhutan is home to 19 different ethnolinguistic groups, representing six primary subgroups of Tibeto-Burman: Tibetic (e.g. Dzongkha), East Bodish (e.g. Kurtöp), Tshangla, Gongduk, Lhop, and ’Olekha. A comparison of ’Olekha agriculture terminology shows similarity with East Bodish languages and Dzongkha. For example, ’Olekha mámá ‘bitter buckwheat’ and carama ‘sweet buckwheat’ are similar to Proto-East Bodish *branma and *gyarama while nápha ‘barley’ and ka: ‘wheat’ are similar to both East Bodish and Dzongkha. Domesticated animal terminology is almost identical to Dzongkha. In terms of kinship the ’Olekha speakers are distinct in Bhutan. For example, apeng ‘grandmother’ and tana ‘grandfather’ and are unlike the terms found elsewhere in Bhutanese languages (’aya, ’angge, ’abi ‘grandmother’ and ’âge, meme, meme ‘grandfather’ in Dzongkha, Kurtöp and Tshangla, respectively). They further lack terms for cross-cousins, which are important kin relations for other Bhutanese groups. The domain of ethnobotany shows the greatest difference between the ’Olekha speakers and other known Bhutanese populations. In addition to having words for plants not used by other groups, the words in this domain show unusual phonological features. For example, a jungle plant commonly used in curries is called sɔʁoʔla (scientific name still to be identified by Botanist), showing a uvular consonant and glottal stop phoneme not found in other Bhutanese languages. In total, approximately 50 such words are found to date. Following a survey of these three semantic domains (agriculture, kinship, ethnobotany) I put forth the tentative hypothesis that these domains exemplify different periods of social history. The ethnobotanical terms illustrate the oldest substrate in the language, representing a time when the original inhabitants were hunter-gatherers and had little contact with other groups. The kinship terminology may represent a similar time period. Agriculture, however, represents the recent contact the ’Olekha speakers have had with the ruling elite.; Kaipuleohone University of Hawai'i Digital Language Archive;http://hdl.handle.net/10125/26102.

Contributor (speaker): Hyslop, Gwendolyn

Creator: Hyslop, Gwendolyn

Date (W3CDTF): 2013-03-02

Description: ’Olekha, a dialect of ‘Black Mountain Mönpa’ (van Driem 1995), is a highly endangered Tibeto- Burman isolate of Central Bhutan with only a handful of fluent speakers remaining. With so few speakers, full documentation and description of many grammatical aspects of the language has been difficult. However, speakers are readily able to discuss various lexical domains, providing a fascinating window into traditional Black Mountain culture. In this paper I illustrate three semantic domains in ’Olekha: agriculture, kinship, and ethnobotany, and discuss how these domains illustrate social history of the ’Olekha speakers apart from and related to other groups in Bhutan. Bhutan is home to 19 different ethnolinguistic groups, representing six primary subgroups of Tibeto-Burman: Tibetic (e.g. Dzongkha), East Bodish (e.g. Kurtöp), Tshangla, Gongduk, Lhop, and ’Olekha. A comparison of ’Olekha agriculture terminology shows similarity with East Bodish languages and Dzongkha. For example, ’Olekha mámá ‘bitter buckwheat’ and carama ‘sweet buckwheat’ are similar to Proto-East Bodish *branma and *gyarama while nápha ‘barley’ and ka: ‘wheat’ are similar to both East Bodish and Dzongkha. Domesticated animal terminology is almost identical to Dzongkha. In terms of kinship the ’Olekha speakers are distinct in Bhutan. For example, apeng ‘grandmother’ and tana ‘grandfather’ and are unlike the terms found elsewhere in Bhutanese languages (’aya, ’angge, ’abi ‘grandmother’ and ’âge, meme, meme ‘grandfather’ in Dzongkha, Kurtöp and Tshangla, respectively). They further lack terms for cross-cousins, which are important kin relations for other Bhutanese groups. The domain of ethnobotany shows the greatest difference between the ’Olekha speakers and other known Bhutanese populations. In addition to having words for plants not used by other groups, the words in this domain show unusual phonological features. For example, a jungle plant commonly used in curries is called sɔʁoʔla (scientific name still to be identified by Botanist), showing a uvular consonant and glottal stop phoneme not found in other Bhutanese languages. In total, approximately 50 such words are found to date. Following a survey of these three semantic domains (agriculture, kinship, ethnobotany) I put forth the tentative hypothesis that these domains exemplify different periods of social history. The ethnobotanical terms illustrate the oldest substrate in the language, representing a time when the original inhabitants were hunter-gatherers and had little contact with other groups. The kinship terminology may represent a similar time period. Agriculture, however, represents the recent contact the ’Olekha speakers have had with the ruling elite.

Identifier (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/10125/26102

Language: English

Language (ISO639): eng

Rights: Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

Table Of Contents: 26102.mp3

OLAC Info

Archive: Language Documentation and Conservation

Description: http://www.language-archives.org/archive/ldc.scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu

GetRecord: OAI-PMH request for OLAC format

GetRecord: Pre-generated XML file

OAI Info

OaiIdentifier: oai:scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu:10125/26102

DateStamp: 2017-05-11

GetRecord: OAI-PMH request for simple DC format

Search Info
Citation: Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2013. Language Documentation and Conservation.
Terms: area_Europe country_GB iso639_eng

http://www.language-archives.org/item.php/oai:scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu:10125/26102
Up-to-date as of: Mon Nov 18 7:29:11 EST 2024

Metadata
Title:		Worlds of knowledge in Central Bhutan: Documentation of ’Olekha
Bibliographic Citation:		Hyslop, Gwendolyn, Hyslop, Gwendolyn; 2013-03-02; ’Olekha, a dialect of ‘Black Mountain Mönpa’ (van Driem 1995), is a highly endangered Tibeto- Burman isolate of Central Bhutan with only a handful of fluent speakers remaining. With so few speakers, full documentation and description of many grammatical aspects of the language has been difficult. However, speakers are readily able to discuss various lexical domains, providing a fascinating window into traditional Black Mountain culture. In this paper I illustrate three semantic domains in ’Olekha: agriculture, kinship, and ethnobotany, and discuss how these domains illustrate social history of the ’Olekha speakers apart from and related to other groups in Bhutan. Bhutan is home to 19 different ethnolinguistic groups, representing six primary subgroups of Tibeto-Burman: Tibetic (e.g. Dzongkha), East Bodish (e.g. Kurtöp), Tshangla, Gongduk, Lhop, and ’Olekha. A comparison of ’Olekha agriculture terminology shows similarity with East Bodish languages and Dzongkha. For example, ’Olekha mámá ‘bitter buckwheat’ and carama ‘sweet buckwheat’ are similar to Proto-East Bodish branma and gyarama while nápha ‘barley’ and ka: ‘wheat’ are similar to both East Bodish and Dzongkha. Domesticated animal terminology is almost identical to Dzongkha. In terms of kinship the ’Olekha speakers are distinct in Bhutan. For example, apeng ‘grandmother’ and tana ‘grandfather’ and are unlike the terms found elsewhere in Bhutanese languages (’aya, ’angge, ’abi ‘grandmother’ and ’âge, meme, meme ‘grandfather’ in Dzongkha, Kurtöp and Tshangla, respectively). They further lack terms for cross-cousins, which are important kin relations for other Bhutanese groups. The domain of ethnobotany shows the greatest difference between the ’Olekha speakers and other known Bhutanese populations. In addition to having words for plants not used by other groups, the words in this domain show unusual phonological features. For example, a jungle plant commonly used in curries is called sɔʁoʔla (scientific name still to be identified by Botanist), showing a uvular consonant and glottal stop phoneme not found in other Bhutanese languages. In total, approximately 50 such words are found to date. Following a survey of these three semantic domains (agriculture, kinship, ethnobotany) I put forth the tentative hypothesis that these domains exemplify different periods of social history. The ethnobotanical terms illustrate the oldest substrate in the language, representing a time when the original inhabitants were hunter-gatherers and had little contact with other groups. The kinship terminology may represent a similar time period. Agriculture, however, represents the recent contact the ’Olekha speakers have had with the ruling elite.; Kaipuleohone University of Hawai'i Digital Language Archive;http://hdl.handle.net/10125/26102.
Contributor (speaker):		Hyslop, Gwendolyn
Creator:		Hyslop, Gwendolyn
Date (W3CDTF):		2013-03-02
Description:		’Olekha, a dialect of ‘Black Mountain Mönpa’ (van Driem 1995), is a highly endangered Tibeto- Burman isolate of Central Bhutan with only a handful of fluent speakers remaining. With so few speakers, full documentation and description of many grammatical aspects of the language has been difficult. However, speakers are readily able to discuss various lexical domains, providing a fascinating window into traditional Black Mountain culture. In this paper I illustrate three semantic domains in ’Olekha: agriculture, kinship, and ethnobotany, and discuss how these domains illustrate social history of the ’Olekha speakers apart from and related to other groups in Bhutan. Bhutan is home to 19 different ethnolinguistic groups, representing six primary subgroups of Tibeto-Burman: Tibetic (e.g. Dzongkha), East Bodish (e.g. Kurtöp), Tshangla, Gongduk, Lhop, and ’Olekha. A comparison of ’Olekha agriculture terminology shows similarity with East Bodish languages and Dzongkha. For example, ’Olekha mámá ‘bitter buckwheat’ and carama ‘sweet buckwheat’ are similar to Proto-East Bodish branma and gyarama while nápha ‘barley’ and ka: ‘wheat’ are similar to both East Bodish and Dzongkha. Domesticated animal terminology is almost identical to Dzongkha. In terms of kinship the ’Olekha speakers are distinct in Bhutan. For example, apeng ‘grandmother’ and tana ‘grandfather’ and are unlike the terms found elsewhere in Bhutanese languages (’aya, ’angge, ’abi ‘grandmother’ and ’âge, meme, meme ‘grandfather’ in Dzongkha, Kurtöp and Tshangla, respectively). They further lack terms for cross-cousins, which are important kin relations for other Bhutanese groups. The domain of ethnobotany shows the greatest difference between the ’Olekha speakers and other known Bhutanese populations. In addition to having words for plants not used by other groups, the words in this domain show unusual phonological features. For example, a jungle plant commonly used in curries is called sɔʁoʔla (scientific name still to be identified by Botanist), showing a uvular consonant and glottal stop phoneme not found in other Bhutanese languages. In total, approximately 50 such words are found to date. Following a survey of these three semantic domains (agriculture, kinship, ethnobotany) I put forth the tentative hypothesis that these domains exemplify different periods of social history. The ethnobotanical terms illustrate the oldest substrate in the language, representing a time when the original inhabitants were hunter-gatherers and had little contact with other groups. The kinship terminology may represent a similar time period. Agriculture, however, represents the recent contact the ’Olekha speakers have had with the ruling elite.
Identifier (URI):		http://hdl.handle.net/10125/26102
Language:		English
Language (ISO639):		eng
Rights:		Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
Table Of Contents:		26102.mp3
OLAC Info
Archive:		Language Documentation and Conservation
Description:		http://www.language-archives.org/archive/ldc.scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu
GetRecord:		OAI-PMH request for OLAC format
GetRecord:		Pre-generated XML file
OAI Info
OaiIdentifier:		oai:scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu:10125/26102
DateStamp:		2017-05-11
GetRecord:		OAI-PMH request for simple DC format
Search Info
Citation:		Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2013. Language Documentation and Conservation.
Terms:		area_Europe country_GB iso639_eng